|
03.04.2007:
Ein sehr interessantes Interview von Roger Waters gibt es in der
aktuellen Uncut Ausgabe. Vom Inhalt her ähnelte es dem
Interview, das Waters erst kürzlich einem kolumbianischen
Radiosender gab. Waters hätte schon genaue Vorstellungen bezüglich
einer Reunion-Tour. Es müßte schon mehr, als nur ein Gig sein.
Mehrere Auftritte in London, LA, New York oder Palästina wären
angebracht! Als Grund bräuchte er eigentlich keinen besonderen
Anlass wie z.B. Live8. Der Grund wäre völlig belanglos Hauptsache
man tritt wieder gemeinsam auf.
Als er gegen Ende seiner
Ausführung betont, dass das Denken in der Band früher seine Sache
war und er alle Lieder und Shows alleine konzipierte macht mir
wieder klar weshalb sich David Gilmour die Sache ganz genau
überlegt. Hier ein von David Baldinger ins deutsche
übersetzter kurzer Auszug:
Was würde es brauchen
um euch wieder auf Tour zu bringen – Geld, einen guten Zweck?
ROGER WATERS: Darum
steht Dave ja jeglichen Plänen jemals wieder etwas zu machen so
widerwillig gegenüber: 20 Jahre lang war das nun sein Baby. Diese
Position möchte er natürlich nicht aufgeben, und warum sollte er
auch? Hören Sie, angenommen wir schaffen es, für irgendeinen Zweck,
und es wäre völlig belanglos welcher das wäre, all unsere Egos, all
den Ballast der Geschichte und all das hinter uns zu lassen, und
vielleicht ein paar Gigs in London, einige in New York und LA,
vielleicht in Palästina spielen würden, dann wäre ich dafür bereit.
Es wäre kein einmaliges Konzert, die ganze Arbeit würde sich für
einen einzigen Gig nicht auszahlen. Aber eine Reihe von
Veranstaltungen, um unser gemeinsames Schaffen würdig abzurunden
wäre für mich eine sehr befriedigende Lösung. Dafür würde ich dann
auch 6 Monate in die Vorbereitungen investieren. Und ich bin mir
sicher, dass Nick das auch so machen würde, glaube aber nicht, dass
Dave dazu bereit wäre und das will. Das ist natürlich sein Vorrecht.
Es ist der Gedanke eine neue Show zu konzipieren, die meine
Phantasie anregt, ungeachtet dessen was ich in den späten 70ern über
Stadien und wie schlimm sie wären gesagt habe. Das habe ich ja zu
der Zeit auch geglaubt. Aber eine Pink Floyd Sache würde eine ganze
Menge an durchdachter Planung mit sich ziehen. Und natürlich war das
Denken, zu der Zeit als ich in der Band war, alleine meine Aufgabe.
Ich habe alle Lieder geschrieben und ich habe alle Shows konzipiert,
das könnte also schwierig werden.
Roger Waters
Interview Uncut Magazin 4/2007
Transcript from lozzyjay
Interview taken from Col´s
wunderful
A Fleeting Glimpse
Do you think Floyd fans
resented you for “splitting” the group and overlooked how much you
contributed to the music?
ROGER WATERS: There’s no question that when we got back together and
did Live8, things took on a slightly different perspective. A huge
number of people saw us on TV and I think it gave them an
opportunity to say “Aha, that’s the guy who wrote the songs” and to
make that connection. I think through the years after I left the
band in ’85 and when they toured in ’87 and in ’94, I was perceived
as the grumpy guy who left in a huff. After Live8 I think they went
“Well, maybe he’s not so grumpy after all”. I thoroughly enjoyed
Live8. I came to it with a very open mind and a very open heart and
decided to just get on with it and do it. So maybe that changed
people’s perceptions, to some extent.
It looked like you choked up during “Wish You Were Here”
ROGER WATERS: That’s pitching it too strong. But I love singing that
song. I only sang the second verse of it. But I always loved singing
it when we were on the road. I still like the song very much. I
wrote it whenever it was, 1975 or something, and it still means a
lot to me.
Is it harder to sing since Syd Barrett died?
ROGER WATERS: I do “Shine On You Crazy Diamond” in my show as well –
and I have to say it was slightly unnerving playing it for a few
performances immediately after Syd died. I still feel a deep
connection with Syd whenever I play those songs. “Shine on” is
specifically about him, but Wish You Were Here is a far more general
piece.
Were drugs the main cause of Syd’s decline?
ROGER WATERS: Oh, yes. I’m sure acid exacerbated symptoms I think
were going to manifest anyway. But I’m not a neurologist so I’m not
really the person to ask. At the top of the pops sessions we did for
See Emily Play he was already getting a bit odd. He was saying
things like “John Lennon doesn’t have to do this. Why should I?” He
was starting to disconnect. It was pretty fast downhill from then
on. By the end of ’68 he wasn’t operating at all.
Then he didn’t show up for a show and he was out. Is that what
happened?
ROGER WATERS: To be brutally honest about it, he wasn’t picked up
for a gig. One day we were going to collect him and we went “Nah”.
We just went and did the gig.
He appeared when you were recording “Shine on you crazy diamond”,
and sat outside the studio didn’t he?
ROGER WATERS: Yes. It was at Abbey Road. He wasn’t sitting outside.
He came into the control room.
Was that a complete accident?
ROGER WATERS: Oh, no. He knew exactly what he was doing and he knew
that we were there. Syd would occasionally turn up for gigs,
expecting to play, I think. I’m not sure what he was expecting that
say. It was a bizarre coincidence that we were working on “Shine on
you crazy diamond” when he turned up. I didn’t recognise him. I
thought he was someone’s friend, this fat, bald bloke, eating sweets
at the back of the studio. It was maybe Dave who eventually said;
“You haven’t caught it yet, have you?” I suddenly said “It’s Syd!”
It was strange.
Did you ever share Syd’s appetite for drugs?
ROGER WATERS: I had lots of chances to take acid – in fact anything
I wanted, really. I took acid twice. Once, I’m not sure what year it
was but it was on the island of Patmos in the Greek Archipelago…this
wasn’t what you get on bits of blotting paper or sugar cubes. This
was off a dropper out of a bottle and it was pure lysergic. It was
an extraordinary experience and it lasted about 48 hours. I took
some more a couple of years later in New York. I remember getting
stuck in the middle of the night on 8th avenue trying to get
something to eat and peering at the traffic lights. I thought, “No,
I don’t want to ever do this again. No, enough, enough” If you want
to know the entire history of my drug taking, I smoked dope for a
few years because I was pretending I was overcoming my nicotine
addiction. I stopped smoking cigarettes, but I’d roll a joint every
morning. I was out of my brain for a couple of years pretending not
to smoke cigarettes. As soon as I finally kicked the nicotine habit,
the dope went with it, as it’s a very pernicious drug. It slows you
down and stops you doing anything productive. It has a very negative
influence on people’s lives.
On the Live8 DVD, things look a bit tense between the band in the
rehearsal footage. Was that the case?
ROGER WATERS: A little bit. It was bound to be, after all the
history. But I went into the whole process determined to roll over
if there was an argument. I know how to work his. If there’s
conflict, I immediately play dead. Then everything will be fine. And
I did and it seemed to work rather well, I have to say.
But you could never roll over and play dead for a whole tour?
ROGER WATERS: No. Rolling over and playing dead isn’t my natural
style. I have far too much life and exuberance and attachment to the
work, and far too many ideas. My natural state is to constantly
express my ideas and feelings, sometimes at full volume. To not be
engaged is a very alien condition for me.
Did it feel like Dave Gilmour was in charge and you were just
doing what he told you?
ROGER WATERS: No, of course not. I was sort of controlling the whole
thing without doing anything. It was a bit like walking on rice
paper. I think it was a bit of a worry to him. I might be wrong, but
he came up with some strange comments after Live 8, one of which was
“I don’t know what the big fuss is about. It would have been just
the same whether roger was there of not”. That illustrated for me
that maybe he doesn’t quite get how important the symbiosis between
the four of us was during “the golden years” of the band. We were
great together. We all made a contribution, but it was the
combination of the four separate talents. It was a very, very
special thing.
What would it take to get you together for a tour – money, a good
cause?
ROGER WATERS: This is why Dave is very reluctant to ever do anything
again: for 20 years it’s been his baby. He doesn’t want to give up
that position and what should he? Listen. If somehow, working
through all our egos, all the history and whatever, we could come
together for a reason - I don’t care what – and maybe do a few gigs
in London, a few in New York and a few in LA, Palestine, wherever.
I’d be up for it. It wouldn’t be a one-off gig, because to do all
that work just for one night wouldn’t be worth it. But a number of
events that would draw a line nicely under the work the four of us
did together would be very satisfying for me. I’d be prepared to
give 6 months or so in terms of preparation for something like that.
I’m sure Nick would as well, but I don’t think Dave wants to. That
his prerogative and I have no down on him. If you’re talking about
building a whole new show, that whets my appetite, not withstanding
what I said in the late ‘70s about stadiums and how bad they were,
all of which I believed at the time. But a Pink Floyd thing, that
would need a lot of serious thinking about. Of course, when I was in
the band, I did all the thinking. I wrote most of the songs and I
made all of the shows, so that might be difficult.
Nick Mason has claimed there was greater collaboration in Pink
Floyd than you care to admit.
ROGER WATERS: Nick and I have become very close friends again, so I
don’t want to ruffle his feathers. Actually, I’m not sure I could
because we joke about this all the time. Most people who see this
interview will be aware of his book, Inside Out. He showed me the
original draft – a lot of which he’d written during the bad years,
when I was the big ogre – and to give him his due he said, “could I
have your comments?” I went through it and almost the entire thing
was blue pencil. He did change odd little bits, but you should read
it. He writes the most marvellous fiction. But I have to say this,
just because I think some of it may be bad doesn’t mean it
necessarily is – we know the human memory is an extraordinary
idiosyncratic and fallible device. People unwittingly construct
memories that are convenient and favourable to the ego. It may well
be that I can, for instance, remember sitting in the shed at the
bottom of my garden in London and putting together the quarter-inch
tape with all of the cash register sounds for the beginning of
“Money” on my own. He remembers us doing it together. Actually maybe
he was there. It’s possible. Who knows?
For years, people have concentrated on your conflicts with Dave,
but are there good memories of working with him as well?
ROGER WATERS: Dave is a great singer. He was a very acute and
sensitive ear for harmony. A lot of those double tracks and the
harmonies where he sings through Dark Side… or on lots of the
records – I sat back while he did that and he’d follow his instincts
and produce these great harmonies. I was always somewhat in awe of
that. It takes great talent to be able to do that, and it’s
something that I really appreciate.
One of the big rifts, of course, was over “Comfortably Numb”
ROGER WATERS: There was an argument. We cut the track, sent it to
Michael Kamen in New York, who wrote and recorded the string charts.
They sounded fantastic, almost the best thing that Michael ever did.
I love it. Dave said he thought the track was sloppy, or something,
and he wanted to recut the drums, the bass, this, that and the other.
As this time I was working in Jacques Loussier’s studio doing vocals
because we realised that we had to split the work up. Dave was still
in Bear Studios, doing keyboard. He recut the basic rhythm of the
piece and stuck it together and went “There you go”. I listened to
it and I hated it. It had suddenly become, for me, very wooden; just
not moving at all. And that was the big argument. I went: “No, the
way it was, was great. This is bad”. He was: “No, the way it was,
was terrible. This is great”. So the song ended up with 4 bars of
his and 4 bars of mine… the whole track is like that. It was a weird
sort of bargaining thing between he and I.
So it was a battle.
ROGER WATERS: Yes, it became a battle. The final track is a
compromise between two different views. Who’s to say whether – if we
went back and listened to the two different versions – we could tell
any difference. The final compromise is so good, I suspect both
versions were great.
You said after your first solo tour that your show was a Pink
Floyd show except that it had a different drummer, guitar and
keyboard player.
ROGER WATERS: Did I say that? How very provocative of me.
Do you think this holds true for this tour?
ROGER WATERS: Absolutely not. I’m mostly playing my own songs. Some
of them are co-written obviously… some of the Dark Side stuff is.
And I’m also treating Dark Side as one might treat a classical piece
of music. So we’re reproducing some of Dave’s solos. I’d have to say
Carol Kenyon, who’s in my band does a great job on Great Gig In The
Sky. She’s fairly faithful to Claire Torry’s original performance on
the record. Audiences go apeshit because they recognise it, but they
see that she reinterprets it without straying too far from the
original notes. That’s not easy. I’ve seen other people trying to
replicate Great Gig, not least on some of the shows that Dave, Rick
and Nick did together. The girls they had didn’t even come close to
the original.
Why do you think Dark Side… is still so popular?
ROGER WATERS: The record is musically sophisticated and yet simple.
The song structures are very simple. Lyrically, it speaks to
successive generations who have continued to have the same concerns
over and over and over again. Sadly, a song like “Us and Them” seems
just as apposite politically in 2006 as it did in 1979. Also a song
like Time expresses feelings lots of young people have when they
reach a certain age and they’re looking for meaning. I hate to be
the one to have to tell you this, all you young people out there,
but it goes on. We keep re-examining out lives and our relationships
with our friends, our family, and other human beings.
There’s no doubt there’s an enormous attachment to the work that
runs through umpteen generations of people which is very moving when
you’re playing it live. In the show, I go out to the edges of the
stage and get close to people. I get empathy from all kinds of
different people, particularly out in the wings where the seats are
a bit cheaper. They’re all ages, from 10- to 80 year olds, and it’s
great.
When was the last time you toured on the scale of this show?
ROGER WATERS: The last big tour I did was in ’87 – the Radio KAOS
tour. Then I did The Wall in Berlin in 1990. What happened then? I
got divorced and moved around for a bit. I did one gig in 1992 for
Don Henley, of his Walden Woods project in the Universal
Amphitheatre in LA. He asked me if I’d sing a few songs. It was Don,
me, John Fogerty and Neil Young. A great night. There was an
enormous feeling of warmth coming off the audience, I thought “Wow,
this isn’t too bad. Maybe I should do some of this again” that was
in the back of my mind through the ‘90s, then, finally in ’99, I
thought I’d dip my toe in the water and see what happened. And it
went well. So I went back out in ’01. Now here I am touring with
Dark Side… and it’s all good.
Pink Floyd were always regarded as musical pioneers. Do you still
think of yourself as an innovator? What are you currently working on
that you think is cutting-edge?
ROGER WATERS: I find myself walking backwards to a simpler musical
expression. There’s a part of me that desperately wants to be Neil
Young, John Prine or Bob Dylan. When I sit alone at home now with a
guitar, I’m often searching for the motherlode of that very simpley
structured melody sequence. We’re always looking for “Knockin’ on
Heaven’s Door” or “Heart of Gold”. There are those nuggets still
there, in the 12 notes, available to us. Having said that, I’ve been
telling people that I’m going to make a new LP for 13 or 14 years
now. I’ve written a ton of songs and they’re all sitting there
waiting. The motivation to finish something or go back into the
studio will be political. I have a strong sense the driving force
will be my political passion.
One of the new songs you’re doing in these shows is “Leaving
Beirut”, which you originally wrote as a short story 25 years ago.
It makes explicit you opposition to the war in Iraq.
ROGER WATERS: It’s the story of me leaving Beirut when I was 19
years old. I was travelling in the Middle East with some friends and
the car broke down. I had to hitchhike home. It was an extraordinary
experience and a great adventure. Anyway, the first night of that
journey I was taken in by a Lebanese/Arab family. They went and
slept on the floor behind the curtain insisting I slept in the only
bed in the place. It was deeply moving, so when Bush and Blair
invaded Iraq in ’03, I was so sad, sick and incensed by that weird,
obvious, extraordinary, stupid, inhuman mistake that I was moved to
write some verses expressing my disapproval. I recorded the short
story and fitted the verses into it. Then I put it out on the web
with another song I wrote at the same time “To kill the child”. It’s
about the invasion of Iraq – about which I’m still confused. We know
I was nothing to do with WMD or 9/11. We know it was nothing to do
with terrorism. Was it just a business move? Was it to create a US
military base in that part of the Middle East? I still have no idea.
There has been a mixed reaction to the song on the tour, hasn’t
there? Were you surprised by that?
ROGER WATERS: Of course. There was nothing negative about the
response to the song in England, because even when we invaded Iraq
in 2003, 75% of the British population was against the invasion. Two
million people demonstrated on the streets of London. How Blair is
still in power, I’ll never know.
The first gig I did in the States was in Holmdel, New Jersey and
there were a few boos when we got to the end of it. Somebody late
told me that there are several US army bases close to Holmdel and
maybe there were some military in the audience. A lot of people have
made the mistake of thinking that song attacks the US servicemen.
Nothing could be further from the truth. My heart goes out to those
guys, who are out there doing their duty as best they can under very
difficult circumstances. And my heart goes out to their families.
The fact I think it’s a useless, senseless war is neither here nor
there. I wouldn’t dream of criticising the foreign police of the
Administration.
Other people in the audiences in the US have written to me. There
was one fabulous couple who came to the show in the Hollywood Bowl
and wrote saying “We paid 600 bucks for our tickets. My wife has
been a huge fan of both of you work and of Pink Floyd. How could you
ruin our evening by turning it into a political rally?” They went
on, “How dare you citicise our president. You’re not even an
American citizen.” Give me a break. I can’t criticise Bush because
I’m not a US citizen? Does this mean you have to be German to
criticise Hitler, or Iraqi to criticise Saddam Hussein or Chinese to
citicise the genocidal policies of Mao Tse-Tung? The idea is
ludicrous. They’ve attacked Neil Young on the same grounds. He’s a
Canadian. Clearly, it’s nonsense.
How would you like to be remembered?
ROGER WATERS: I’d like to be remembered as somebody who spoke his
truth and stood by it through thick and thin and wasn’t to be
diverted by the vagaries of fashion or popularity or anything else.
I paint what I see.
What’s the biggest mistake you’ve ever made in your career?
ROGER WATERS: Oh, my god! I think it was the aftermath of the schism,
when I left Pink Floyd in 1985, by allowing myself to be drawn into
the public debate and saying unpleasant things about the other guys.
If I’d been wise I’d have kept my mouths hut. It was kind of ugly
and I regret that.
Have you written your masterpiece yet?
Masterpiece is a very big word. I think I’ve been involved in making
some records that are pretty good. Dark Side of The Moon, The Wall
and Amused to Death, I would name probably as the three works I’m
most proud of.
Are you currently re-writing The Wall?
ROGER WATERS: I’m engaged in rewriting it as a piece for musical
theatre. Hopefully it’ll appear on Broadway in the next couple of
years. I’m working with an English writer called Lee Hall. We’re
having a lot of fun. My motivation for revisiting the piece was that
both the original record and the movie and kind of dour and bleak.
I’m not dour and bleak! Humour’s always been a very important part
of my life. I laugh a lot with my family and friends. So I’m writing
a bunch of laughs into The Wall.
You’ve also written an opera, Ca Ira, the first recording of
which you released in 2005. What’s it been like moving from rock to
classical music?
ROGER WATERS: It’s a technical thing. Music is music whatever the
genre. Whether I’m arranging a rock’n’roll song or writing for and
arranging an orchestra, in inherent problems are the same. It’s just
painting with a different palette. You’re trying to move people.
Music is very, very simple. You’re just organising sounds to try to
elicit an emotional response from the listener or viewer.
The opera’s about the French revolution. What drew you to the
subject?
ROGER WATERS: The original libretto was written by friends of mine,
a French couple called Etienne and Nadine Roda Gil. Although it’s a
specific history of the early years of the French Revolution, it’s
also about tyranny and how we respond to it. It’s about
egalitarianism…freedom, learning reason. How we can allow our
knowledge of history, and the empirical data we have at our
fingertips, to find out way through modern life and come out the
other end with more people happier more of the time.
Is there one song you’ve written that sums up all you ever wanted
to say through music?
ROGER WATERS: Two songs sprang immediately to mind: “Us and Them”
and “Wish You Were Here”.
What are you planning after this tour finishes?
ROGER WATERS: It’s a lot of work putting this show together. I like
what we’ve done. I’m still working on it and will continue to. But
when we get to the end of this next leg on July 14, that’ll be it
for a while. I have so many other things I’ve wanted to do. I won’t
be going on the road in 2008. I know I won’t. I won’t carry on. |
 |